https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717
--- Comment #32 from Scott Talbert <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tarulia from comment #31) > Noticed this while doing further experiments with my Aegisub build. > > When I check `alternatives --list`, I see 2 entries for wxWidgets: > > ``` > ❯ alternatives --list | grep wx > wx-config auto /usr/lib64/wx/config/gtk3-unicode-3.3 > wxrc auto /usr/libexec/wxWidgets/wxrc > ``` > > But from the spec I can't tell why `wxrc` is getting an alternatives setup. > There's only one file from `wxBase`, but none from the others. Do wxGTK and > wxQt even produce their own `wxrc`, or do they all share the same? > > Also, if it had actual alternatives, shouldn't those be grouped with the > respective `wx-config` so they are all swapped in tandem? It's because the existing wxGTK package (wxWidgets 3.2) also provides wxrc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2443717 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202443717%23c32 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
