Hi Jason,
I modify the setting as you suggested but still not working. I switched the
deauthMethod to SNMP, assign two new snmp strings to the swtich. I also
changed the SNMP to version 1. Below is the new config.
switches.conf
[192.168.1.12]
mode=production
deauthMethod=SNMP
type=Cisco::Catalyst_2960
VoIPEnabled=N
uplink=24
radiusSecret=useStrongerSecret
defaultVlan=1
SNMPCommunityRead=public2960
SNMPCommunityWrite=private2960
pfsw2960#show running-config | in snmp
snmp-server community public RO
snmp-server community private RW
snmp-server community public2960 RO
snmp-server community private2960 RW
snmp-server enable traps snmp linkdown linkup
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps port-security trap-rate 1
snmp-server enable traps mac-notification change move threshold
snmp-server host 192.168.1.5 public2960 port-security
I was making the changes via Web UI. I noticed when I click on the IP
address of the switch, packetfence.log gave me some error like this:
Jul 16 13:20:09 httpd.admin(0) ERROR: Use of uninitialized value $value in
string eq at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/HTML/FormHandler/Widget/Field/Select.pm line
90.
(pfappserver::__ANON__)
After I modified the setting of the switch, and clicked on save,
packetfence.log gave some error like this:
Jul 16 13:20:25 httpd.admin(0) INFO: Changes successfully commited
(pfappserver::Base::Controller::Crud::Config::_commitChanges)
Jul 16 13:20:25 httpd.admin(0) ERROR: Argument "default" isn't numeric in
pack at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/util.pm line 456.
(pfappserver::__ANON__)
I guess these might not be the cause of the issue because I can verify the
setting from the configure file directly. But why there are error pop up?
Regards,
Jacky
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jason Frisvold <[email protected]>wrote:
> forbmsyn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I re-installed PF on CentOS and re-did the configuration. After that I
> > plugged a laptop into one of the switch port with the following config.
> > IP of my switch is 192.168.1.12
>
> I'm not sure if the [default] section of switches.conf works the way you
> think it does... I could be wrong (And I really want to know myself),
> but I don't believe it falls back to those settings if they're not
> specified elsewhere.
>
> > [192.168.1.12]
> > mode=production
> > deauthMethod=SSH
>
> This is also another issue. You're using a deauthMethod of SSH, so I
> don't think any of the SNMP stuff you're expecting will work. Switch
> this to SNMP and see if that makes a difference. If not, then go a step
> further and specify the community strings for this switch directly and
> see if that helps.
>
> > Regards,
> > Jacky
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
> [email protected]
> ---------------------------
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\"
> - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
