Hi louis and list, > Hello Experts > I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524 switch and > an > ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the packetfence 5.0.1 > server). > I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation vlan(eth0.3), and > management vlan(eth0) interfaces. > I have defined my switch in the packetfence server. > on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan), > vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest). > port-security has been activated on the switch ports
> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command > # tail -f snmptrapd.log > 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN > TYPE > 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S > this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command > # tail -f packetfence.log > Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node > 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify) > Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data > initialized (pf::useragent::_init) > Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a Fingerbank > lookup > for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank) > Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55] redirected to > authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence) > Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep > recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. > (main::) > Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep > recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. > (main::) > Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep > recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. > (main::) > in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can communicate > with the switch > but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand. > please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner. I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is using routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is relevant for this issue. In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the packetfence packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the web-wizard. I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After connecting a device, snmptrap log shows: ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <== 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER: 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER: 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER: 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING: "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20";|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20 = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER: 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER: 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER: 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS And then packetfence.log shows: ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <== Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" at (eval 2047) line 47. (main::) It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not, it just throws the same error. I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it out (yes, quite frustrating :)) Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you figure this out perhaps? Thanks in advance. Hugo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
