Hi James,

Thanks for your reply. It resolves the errors when starting pfsetvlan, but the 
initial error remains:

Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep 
recursion on subroutine 
"CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
 at (eval 2124) line 47.
 (main::)
Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep 
recursion on subroutine 
"CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
 at (eval 2124) line 47.
 (main::)


What I am wondering is how my setup is different from any other ones, since 
this is quite a standard setup I think? I assume this error is normally not 
triggered (because otherwise everyone would have run into this)?
Does it make sense to try the latest snapshot?

Thanks again.

Regards,
Hugo


> Apply the following patch on top of the previous one.
> 
> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/10edc098f9f9c6360ca322c9a17571b24dbe5a11.diff
> 
> James Rouzier
> [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
> (http://www.packetfence.org)
> 
> On 2015-06-14 5:08 PM, Hugo Rodenburg wrote:
>> Hi Fabrice,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>
>>> let's try that:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>>>
>> #/usr/local/pf$ sudo patch -p1 < 
>> ~/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>> patching file addons/accounting.pl
>> patching file addons/recovery.pl
>> patching file lib/pf/CHI.pm
>> patching file sbin/pfsetvlan
>>
>> However:
>>
>> /usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan start
>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Can't 
>> locate
>> Test/Deep.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib /etc/perl
>> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5
>> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14
>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Runtime.pm line 317.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 7.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>      ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt to
>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 382) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 
>> 20.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 
>> 20.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 383) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> ...
>>
>> Ok, so I installed the (apparantly) missing perl lib:
>> $ sudo apt-get install libtest-deep-perl
>>
>> But, still no luck:
>>
>> #/usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan restart
>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Base class
>> package "Test::Class" is empty.
>>      (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first,
>>      or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib
>>      /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2
>>      /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14
>>      /usr/local/lib/site_perl).
>>   at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 7.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 
>> 7.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 387) line 2.
>>      ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/t/Driver.pm line 
>> 17.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 385) line 2.
>>      ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 8.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>      ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt to
>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 389) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 
>> 20.
>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 
>> 20.
>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 390) line 2.
>>   at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>> service|command
>> pfsetvlan|stop
>>
>> Am I missing an dependency?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Le 2015-06-14 13:28, Hugo Rodenburg a écrit :
>>>> Hi louis and list,
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Experts
>>>>> I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524 switch 
>>>>> and an
>>>>> ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the packetfence 
>>>>> 5.0.1
>>>>> server).
>>>>> I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation vlan(eth0.3), 
>>>>> and
>>>>> management vlan(eth0) interfaces.
>>>>> I have defined my switch in the packetfence server.
>>>>> on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan),
>>>>> vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest).
>>>>> port-security has been activated on the switch ports
>>>>> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command
>>>>> # tail -f snmptrapd.log
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP: 
>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>> this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command
>>>>> # tail -f packetfence.log
>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node
>>>>> 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify)
>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data
>>>>> initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a Fingerbank 
>>>>> lookup
>>>>> for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank)
>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55] redirected 
>>>>> to
>>>>> authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence)
>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>> (main::)
>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>> (main::)
>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>> (main::)
>>>>> in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can 
>>>>> communicate
>>>>> with the switch
>>>>> but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand.
>>>>> please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner.
>>>> I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0 on 
>>>> Ubuntu
>>>> 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is 
>>>> using
>>>> routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is 
>>>> relevant for
>>>> this issue.
>>>> In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the packetfence
>>>> packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the 
>>>> web-wizard.
>>>> I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After 
>>>> connecting
>>>> a device, snmptrap log shows:
>>>>
>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <==
>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: 
>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER:
>>>> 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER:
>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER:
>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING:
>>>> "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20";|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20
>>>> = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: 
>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D
>>>> |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And then packetfence.log shows:
>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <==
>>>> Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>> recursion on subroutine
>>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>>> at (eval 2047) line 47.
>>>>    (main::)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not, it 
>>>> just
>>>> throws the same error.
>>>> I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it out 
>>>> (yes,
>>>> quite frustrating :))
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you 
>>>> figure this
>>>> out perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Hugo
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to