Hi, > Hi James, > > Thanks for your reply. It resolves the errors when starting pfsetvlan, but the > initial error remains: > > Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep > recursion on subroutine > "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" > at (eval 2124) line 47. > (main::) > Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep > recursion on subroutine > "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" > at (eval 2124) line 47. > (main::) > > > What I am wondering is how my setup is different from any other ones, since > this > is quite a standard setup I think? I assume this error is normally not > triggered (because otherwise everyone would have run into this)? > Does it make sense to try the latest snapshot?
Tried the latest snapshot anyway (took a snap of the vm PF is running on), but that didn't make any difference. > > Thanks again. > > Regards, > Hugo > > >> Apply the following patch on top of the previous one. >> >> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/10edc098f9f9c6360ca322c9a17571b24dbe5a11.diff >> >> James Rouzier >> [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://www.inverse.ca >> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence >> (http://www.packetfence.org) >> >> On 2015-06-14 5:08 PM, Hugo Rodenburg wrote: >>> Hi Fabrice, >>> >>> Thanks for the quick response! >>> >>>> let's try that: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff >>>> >>> #/usr/local/pf$ sudo patch -p1 < >>> ~/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff >>> patching file addons/accounting.pl >>> patching file addons/recovery.pl >>> patching file lib/pf/CHI.pm >>> patching file sbin/pfsetvlan >>> >>> However: >>> >>> /usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan start >>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Can't >>> locate >>> Test/Deep.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib /etc/perl >>> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 >>> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 >>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Runtime.pm line 317. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 7. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2. >>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt >>> to >>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 382) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached : >>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line >>> 20. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line >>> 20. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 383) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> ... >>> >>> Ok, so I installed the (apparantly) missing perl lib: >>> $ sudo apt-get install libtest-deep-perl >>> >>> But, still no luck: >>> >>> #/usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan restart >>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Base >>> class >>> package "Test::Class" is empty. >>> (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first, >>> or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib >>> /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 >>> /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 >>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl). >>> at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 7. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm >>> line 7. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 387) line 2. >>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/t/Driver.pm line >>> 17. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 385) line 2. >>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 8. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2. >>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt >>> to >>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 389) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached : >>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line >>> 20. >>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at >>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line >>> 20. >>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 390) line 2. >>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28. >>> service|command >>> pfsetvlan|stop >>> >>> Am I missing an dependency? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Hugo >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Le 2015-06-14 13:28, Hugo Rodenburg a écrit : >>>>> Hi louis and list, >>>>> >>>>>> Hello Experts >>>>>> I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524 >>>>>> switch and an >>>>>> ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the packetfence >>>>>> 5.0.1 >>>>>> server). >>>>>> I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation vlan(eth0.3), >>>>>> and >>>>>> management vlan(eth0) interfaces. >>>>>> I have defined my switch in the packetfence server. >>>>>> on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan), >>>>>> vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest). >>>>>> port-security has been activated on the switch ports >>>>>> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command >>>>>> # tail -f snmptrapd.log >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP: >>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE >>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S >>>>>> this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command >>>>>> # tail -f packetfence.log >>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node >>>>>> 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify) >>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data >>>>>> initialized (pf::useragent::_init) >>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a Fingerbank >>>>>> lookup >>>>>> for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank) >>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55] redirected >>>>>> to >>>>>> authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence) >>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep >>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. >>>>>> (main::) >>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep >>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. >>>>>> (main::) >>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep >>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U. >>>>>> (main::) >>>>>> in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can >>>>>> communicate >>>>>> with the switch >>>>>> but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand. >>>>>> please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner. >>>>> I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0 on >>>>> Ubuntu >>>>> 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is >>>>> using >>>>> routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is >>>>> relevant for >>>>> this issue. >>>>> In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the >>>>> packetfence >>>>> packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the >>>>> web-wizard. >>>>> I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After >>>>> connecting >>>>> a device, snmptrap log shows: >>>>> >>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <== >>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: >>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE >>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS >>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER: >>>>> 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER: >>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER: >>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING: >>>>> "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20";|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20 >>>>> = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS >>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: >>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE >>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS >>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER: >>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER: >>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D >>>>> |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER: >>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And then packetfence.log shows: >>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <== >>>>> Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep >>>>> recursion on subroutine >>>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" >>>>> at (eval 2047) line 47. >>>>> (main::) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not, it >>>>> just >>>>> throws the same error. >>>>> I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it out >>>>> (yes, >>>>> quite frustrating :)) >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you >>>>> figure this >>>>> out perhaps? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>>> Hugo >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PacketFence-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PacketFence-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> PacketFence-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ PacketFence-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
