Hi
Just wondering if there is any progress on this issue, I am getting the same
issue running 5.2 (stable) on ubuntu 12.04 (fresh install) switch is Dlink
DGS-3210
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Instantiate a new iptables modification
method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: saving existing iptables to
/usr/local/pf/var/iptables.bak (pf::iptables::iptables_save)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) WARN: We are using IPSET
(pf::ipset::iptables_generate)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: flushing iptables
(pf::ipset::iptables_flush_mangle)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: restoring iptables from
/usr/local/pf/var/conf/iptables.conf (pf::iptables::iptables_restore)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0.1 took 0.006
seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:38 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0.3 took 0.008
seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:41 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0 took 0.010
seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:43 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdns took 0.007 seconds to start.
(pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfmon took 2.414 seconds to start.
(pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: generating
/usr/local/pf/var/conf/snmptrapd.conf
(pf::services::manager::snmptrapd::generateConfig)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon snmptrapd took 0.044 seconds to
start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfsetvlan(7779) INFO: pfsetvlan starting and writing 7780 to
/usr/local/pf/var/run/pfsetvlan.pid (pf::services::util::createpid)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfsetvlan(7779) INFO: Process started (main::)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfsetvlan took 2.283 seconds to
start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon radiusd took 2.126 seconds to
start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon radsniff3 took 0.094 seconds to
start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon statsd took 0.008 seconds to start.
(pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon winbindd-Archerfish.conf took 0.023
seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:59 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
recursion on subroutine
"CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
at (eval 2111) line 47.
(main::)
Jul 09 19:52:23 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
recursion on subroutine
"CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
at (eval 2111) line 47.
(main::)
Jul 09 19:53:31 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
recursion on subroutine
"CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
at (eval 2111) line 47.
(main::)
Cheers
Andrew
> On 17 Jun 2015, at 6:08 am, Hugo Rodenburg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just found out there is an open issue on github regarding this:
> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/655
> I think it makes more sense to track this in the github issue tracker, since
> it is already an filed bug.
>
> Hugo
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply. It resolves the errors when starting pfsetvlan, but
>>> the
>>> initial error remains:
>>>
>>> Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>> recursion on subroutine
>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>> at (eval 2124) line 47.
>>> (main::)
>>> Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>> recursion on subroutine
>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>> at (eval 2124) line 47.
>>> (main::)
>>>
>>>
>>> What I am wondering is how my setup is different from any other ones, since
>>> this
>>> is quite a standard setup I think? I assume this error is normally not
>>> triggered (because otherwise everyone would have run into this)?
>>> Does it make sense to try the latest snapshot?
>>
>> Tried the latest snapshot anyway (took a snap of the vm PF is running on),
>> but
>> that didn't make any difference.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Hugo
>>>
>>>
>>>> Apply the following patch on top of the previous one.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/10edc098f9f9c6360ca322c9a17571b24dbe5a11.diff
>>>>
>>>> James Rouzier
>>>> [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
>>>> (http://www.packetfence.org)
>>>>
>>>> On 2015-06-14 5:08 PM, Hugo Rodenburg wrote:
>>>>> Hi Fabrice,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>>>>
>>>>>> let's try that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>>>>>>
>>>>> #/usr/local/pf$ sudo patch -p1 <
>>>>> ~/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>>>>> patching file addons/accounting.pl
>>>>> patching file addons/recovery.pl
>>>>> patching file lib/pf/CHI.pm
>>>>> patching file sbin/pfsetvlan
>>>>>
>>>>> However:
>>>>>
>>>>> /usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan start
>>>>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line
>>>>> 13.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Can't
>>>>> locate
>>>>> Test/Deep.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib /etc/perl
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Runtime.pm line 317.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 7.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>>>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base :
>>>>> Attempt to
>>>>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 382) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>>>>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm
>>>>> line 20.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm
>>>>> line 20.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 383) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so I installed the (apparantly) missing perl lib:
>>>>> $ sudo apt-get install libtest-deep-perl
>>>>>
>>>>> But, still no luck:
>>>>>
>>>>> #/usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan restart
>>>>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line
>>>>> 13.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Base
>>>>> class
>>>>> package "Test::Class" is empty.
>>>>> (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package
>>>>> first,
>>>>> or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains:
>>>>> /usr/local/pf/lib
>>>>> /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2
>>>>> /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14
>>>>> /usr/share/perl/5.14
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl).
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 7.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm
>>>>> line 7.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 387) line 2.
>>>>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/t/Driver.pm
>>>>> line 17.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 385) line 2.
>>>>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>>>> ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base :
>>>>> Attempt to
>>>>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 389) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>>>>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm
>>>>> line 20.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm
>>>>> line 20.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 390) line 2.
>>>>> at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> service|command
>>>>> pfsetvlan|stop
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I missing an dependency?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hugo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 2015-06-14 13:28, Hugo Rodenburg a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi louis and list,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Experts
>>>>>>>> I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524
>>>>>>>> switch and an
>>>>>>>> ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the
>>>>>>>> packetfence 5.0.1
>>>>>>>> server).
>>>>>>>> I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation
>>>>>>>> vlan(eth0.3), and
>>>>>>>> management vlan(eth0) interfaces.
>>>>>>>> I have defined my switch in the packetfence server.
>>>>>>>> on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan),
>>>>>>>> vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest).
>>>>>>>> port-security has been activated on the switch ports
>>>>>>>> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command
>>>>>>>> # tail -f snmptrapd.log
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP:
>>>>>>>> [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command
>>>>>>>> # tail -f packetfence.log
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node
>>>>>>>> 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data
>>>>>>>> initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a
>>>>>>>> Fingerbank lookup
>>>>>>>> for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55]
>>>>>>>> redirected to
>>>>>>>> authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally:
>>>>>>>> Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally:
>>>>>>>> Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally:
>>>>>>>> Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can
>>>>>>>> communicate
>>>>>>>> with the switch
>>>>>>>> but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand.
>>>>>>>> please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner.
>>>>>>> I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0
>>>>>>> on Ubuntu
>>>>>>> 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is
>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>> routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is
>>>>>>> relevant for
>>>>>>> this issue.
>>>>>>> In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the
>>>>>>> packetfence
>>>>>>> packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the
>>>>>>> web-wizard.
>>>>>>> I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After
>>>>>>> connecting
>>>>>>> a device, snmptrap log shows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <==
>>>>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP:
>>>>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING:
>>>>>>> "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20";|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20
>>>>>>> = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP:
>>>>>>> [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D
>>>>>>> |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And then packetfence.log shows:
>>>>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <==
>>>>>>> Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine
>>>>>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>>>>>> at (eval 2047) line 47.
>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not,
>>>>>>> it just
>>>>>>> throws the same error.
>>>>>>> I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it
>>>>>>> out (yes,
>>>>>>> quite frustrating :))
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you
>>>>>>> figure this
>>>>>>> out perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hugo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
