Hi Hugo,

let's try that:

https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff

Regards
Fabrice


Le 2015-06-14 13:28, Hugo Rodenburg a écrit :
> Hi louis and list,
>
>> Hello Experts
>> I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524 switch 
>> and an
>> ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the packetfence 
>> 5.0.1
>> server).
>> I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation vlan(eth0.3), and
>> management vlan(eth0) interfaces.
>> I have defined my switch in the packetfence server.
>> on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan),
>> vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest).
>> port-security has been activated on the switch ports
>> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command
>> # tail -f snmptrapd.log
>> 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN 
>> TYPE
>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>> this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command
>> # tail -f packetfence.log
>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node
>> 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify)
>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data
>> initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a Fingerbank 
>> lookup
>> for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank)
>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55] redirected to
>> authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence)
>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>> (main::)
>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>> (main::)
>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>> (main::)
>> in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can communicate
>> with the switch
>> but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand.
>> please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner.
> I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0 on 
> Ubuntu 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is 
> using routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is 
> relevant for this issue.
> In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the packetfence 
> packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the web-wizard.
> I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After 
> connecting a device, snmptrap log shows:
>
> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <==
> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN 
> TYPE 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS 
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER: 
> 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER: 
> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER: 
> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING: 
> "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20";|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20
>  = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN 
> TYPE 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS 
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER: 
> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER: 
> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D 
> |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER: 
> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>
>
> And then packetfence.log shows:
> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <==
> Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep 
> recursion on subroutine 
> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>  at (eval 2047) line 47.
>   (main::)
>
>
> It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not, it 
> just throws the same error.
> I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it out 
> (yes, quite frustrating :))
>
> Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you figure 
> this out perhaps?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Hugo
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to