People that value their privacy should be treated and placated as if they are paranoid tin-foil hatters, and treated with respect for that attitude.
We have to both avoid break their privacy, and APPEAR to avoid breaking their privacy, AND appear to treat them with respect. Adam K On 3 April 2010 07:54, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org> wrote: >> -=| Steffen Mueller, Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 08:21:37PM +0200 |=- >>> Am I the only one who feels vaguely uncomfortable with that? >> No. >> >> Data collection always makes me feel uneasy. I can imagine it >> improving development and ultimately user experience, but I am always >> very sceptical about data collectors (as an user). >> >> In case my paranoya matters, please enable data collection only after >> prompting the user. In that prompt, include all the information about >> what and why is collected and also include a checkbox for allowing >> sending of the data. If later more information starts to be collected, >> ask again for permission (unless one was already denied). >> >> As for when to prompt, the first start after upgrade seems like the >> best moment to me. I often run an application right after upgrade, just >> to see what's new. > > I am not sure what are you worried about. > I wrote start collecting data on the local machine and DO NOT send > it to anywhere. It is just like logging to make debugging easier. > > I also wrote ask the user if you can send the data and send only if she > approves it. > > Are we so worried that we would not even want to log this data on the > local disk? > > Gabor > _______________________________________________ > Padre-dev mailing list > Padre-dev@perlide.org > http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev > _______________________________________________ Padre-dev mailing list Padre-dev@perlide.org http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev
