Hi Chris,

There is a Tools->PopularityContest->Show current report menu option showing
what would be send.

This is too much hidden to be really usable, but it's there :-)

Sebastian 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: padre-dev-boun...@perlide.org 
> [mailto:padre-dev-boun...@perlide.org] Im Auftrag von chm
> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. April 2010 17:06
> An: padre-dev@perlide.org
> Betreff: Re: [Padre-dev] data collection in Padre
> 
> On 4/2/2010 2:21 PM, Steffen Mueller wrote:
> >
> > Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >> Looking at the logs there are very few people who have 
> turned that plugin on. 
> >>
> >> My assumption is that it is because it requires extra action and 
> >> there is a
> >>
> >> lack of knowledge on what it will do.
> >> IMHO it is not because they don't want to share the data.
> 
> I did not turn the plugin because I don't like my computer 
> sending out information without my knowledge.  Signing "yes" 
> is not enough.
> 
> >> I think that popularity collection should also be moved to 
> the core 
> >> code and it
> >>
> >> should be always on BUT it should not send data without asking the 
> >> user for approval. For now I'd start collecting data and 
> save it in 
> >> files so we can
> >>
> >> already use the data collected on our own computer.
> >
> > Personally, I'd not appreciate nags and certainly not if any data 
> > collection was turned on by default. I think I'm not alone 
> in that regard.
> >
> >
> >> Later when we start sending the data, IMHO it should not be at 
> >> shutdown time
> >>
> >> it should be at some seemingly random time during work.
> >
> > Am I the only one who feels vaguely uncomfortable with that?
> 
> As a developer for the PDL module, I've wished for more 
> specific feedback from user installations.  Some ideas I've 
> had to possibly address information security
> concerns:
> 
> (1) Document exactly what is being sent
> 
> (2) Collect data in a local file for reference
> 
> (3) Prompt for review and permission to submit
>      or even require the user to mail themselves
> 
> (4) Acknowledgement of receipt of information
>      to close the loop
> 
> I'm not sure if transparency is enough but some of these 
> might be a step in the right direction.
> 
> --Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Padre-dev mailing list
> Padre-dev@perlide.org
> http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

_______________________________________________
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
http://mail.perlide.org/mailman/listinfo/padre-dev

Reply via email to