Why recompile to MSVC 6? Why don't they release a CDK that _works_with_their_own_product_??? -- -Richard M. Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW! > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryon Lape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Yeah, and why they just don't recompile with C++ 6.0 > and release that SDK is beyond me. Version 6 has been out > long enough to be supported. Then again, I dislike the > Micro$oft compiler very much. I found the Borland one to be > a better product. Well, ok, I liked 5.0 far better than 6.0.
- Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Frank 'Psycho' Spychalski
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Michael Yam
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Scot_Stennis
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Bryon Lape
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Dave Lippincott
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Jean Cyr
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Richard Hartman
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Roger Chaplin
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Bryon Lape
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Bryon Lape
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Jean Cyr
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Jason Dawes
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Dave Lippincott
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Jean Cyr
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Ade Barkah
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Bryon Lape
- Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0 Florent Pillet
