Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0

[Jason Dawes]

At 11:08 AM 5/6/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Yes, we've all heard this before. Everything and anything from Microsoft
>is inferior. This is a view commonly held by many MS bashers who have
>never had to do any serious development, and deliver real product.

Hmm.. I hold this view and I've done quite a bit of serious development and
delivered real product (not to mention being an MCP).  Their compiler _is_
inferior.  However, their IDE, customer support and documentation goes from
average to excellent.  (Also, they have great marketing)

>Why is it then that virtually all Windows products are Microsoft Foundation
>Class based and built using Microsoft Visual C++?

Mainly because of inertia, good documentation and availablility.  Where is
Borland (et al)'s equivalent to MSDN?