I'm not so sure the CDK can be compiler independent. The problem right now
arises from the debug versions of the DLLs. Wouldn't all the compilers need to use
the same format for debug DLLs? Or perhaps, debug version compiled for different
products and choose on install??
bryon
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 5/6/99 at 9:17 AM Dave Lippincott wrote:
>Yes, Borland has much better products that are easier to use. I've always
>found their C/C++ development products to be superior than anything from MS
>. If there is enough of us that says something to Palm, they will begin to
>support other compilers. I think we already got them thinking in the
>correct direction.
>The CDK needs to be compiler-independent. From what I've seen, there may be
>more Borland, VB and third party compilers being used in general than
>MSVC++.
>
>Dave
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bryon Lape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:16 PM
>Subject: Re: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0
>
>
>Yeah, and why they just don't recompile with C++ 6.0 and release that SDK is
>beyond me. Version 6 has been out long enough to be supported. Then again,
>I dislike the Micro$oft compiler very much. I found the Borland one to be a
>better product. Well, ok, I liked 5.0 far better than 6.0.
>
>bryon
>
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 5/5/99 at 12:45 PM Michael Yam wrote:
>
>>The Palm devzone FAQ page has your answer and a whole lot more. Visit:
>>
>>http://palm.3com.com/devzone/index.html
>>
>>There's a FAQ link at the bottom of the page.
>>
>>The short answer is that both versions will work but you can't debug with
>>VC++ 6.0.
>>
>>You may also want to subscribe to the conduit-dev mailing list. Visit:
>>
>>http://ls.palm.com/
>>
>>Michael Yam
>>Y Technology, Inc.
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Frank 'Psycho' Spychalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Palm Developer Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 11:03 AM
>>Subject: Visual C++ 6.0 and CDK 3.0
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I heard about problems with the CDK 3.0 and VC++ 6.0. What should I do if
>>I have to write a conduit, try to get VC++ 5.0 or use 6.0 anyway?
>>
>>Bye
>>Frank
>>
>>Frank 'Psycho' Spychalski don't take life too serious
>> you won't get out of it alive
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Did you get your bonus check?, visit http://www.grey-net.com/
>Need Hits? Get over 3 million for free.
>http://www.freeyellow.com/members7/ropeman/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Did you get your bonus check?, visit http://www.grey-net.com/
Need Hits? Get over 3 million for free.
http://www.freeyellow.com/members7/ropeman/
