>>You kill the app if it lets exceptions out... > >That'd be great in theory. In practice, not all compilers and languages >support exceptions, and I'm unsure as to whether the OS should >mandate/enforce one way of implementing exceptions. I know that this has been a topic of some contention in the CE world. I don't know the details, but apparently Windows programming involves a ton of callbacks (almost constantly). Since none of the callbacks support exceptions, MFC has some hideously hacked-together exception structure which doesn't really work at all. If you're going to include exceptions, it had better be done right, otherwise it's almost worse than having a consistent, non-exception way of dealing with things. Regards, Ben Flaumenhaft
- PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Andreas Linke
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) krollin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Michael Yam
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) B. Flaumenhaft
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Chris Antos
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Roger Chaplin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Bill Goodman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
