At 02:29 PM 9/23/99 -0700, Chris Antos wrote: >but mandatory requirement to use C++ exceptions is not good. You misread me. I don't mean that they should enforce the use of them, just that they should mandate an official method, which all languages could use if they wanted. If the languages didn't want to, or couldn't (in which case why use them?), the default would happily kill the app that let one go (hmm, sounds suspiciously like some varieties of unix).
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) krollin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Michael Yam
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) B. Flaumenhaft
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Chris Antos
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Jason Dawes
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Roger Chaplin
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Bill Goodman
- Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) David Fedor
- RE: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!) Richard Hartman
