Re: PalmOS improvements (was: C++ SDK wanted!)

[Roger Chaplin]

Jason Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At 02:29 PM 9/23/99 -0700, Chris Antos wrote:
> >but mandatory requirement to use C++ exceptions is not good.
> 
> You misread me.  I don't mean that they should enforce the use of them,
> just that they should mandate an official method, which all languages could
> use if they wanted.  If the languages didn't want to, or couldn't (in which
> case why use them?)

I think the issue is more than just language; it is toolset. IIRC, 
CodeWarrior does an acceptable job supporting exceptions, while GCC 
does not. So you question then becomes, "Why use GCC?" My answer is, 
"Because it does what I need it to and I can afford it."

--
Roger Chaplin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>