> > We don't implement "functionality like portage does". We start with use > cases and then implement a solution that fits those cases. So... What's > the use case here? > > > It's simple. One NFS file server with portage on it (and > distfiles, of course) and cron job doing paludis -s. Multiple Gentoo > clients that mount portage.
its even simpler: portage only readonly for the majority of clients, one master to keep the portage-tree in sync. if 10 clients doing each their own sync its pretty pointless to me, the tree wont become any "fresher". regards, m -- [uid] mathias gumz [mail] akira at fluxbox dot org [pgp] 1024D/F6F6B18C [www] http://www.darkshed.net/ [irc] ak|ra (#fluxbox at freenode.org) _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
