On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:48:31 +0200
Goran Mekić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:29:03 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not the program. The system call.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ which flock
> /usr/bin/flock
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ file /usr/bin/flock 
> /usr/bin/flock: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
> for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ 
> 
> It's a program, to me. Yeah, it just uses lockf(3) system call, but
> it is a program

The program isn't how we'd do it for all sorts of reasons (it's not
correct, reliable or error-safe). If we were to introduce locking,
we'd make fetchers output to stdout instead of a file and move the file
handling into the C++ code.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
paludis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user

Reply via email to