On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:28:36 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For that particular case, is lockf a better solution?
>
First, sorry for the delay in posts, I've been busy lately. Just as an
illustration of the presented idea, here is the script
http://nopaste.org/p/aSRie2Yyd. A lot of things is missing. First, on FreeBSD
the program is lockf not flock. I've tried to download the same package with 2
paludis processes, and it works as expected - first one downloads, second one
waits.
--
FreeB(eer)S(ex)D(drugs) are the real daemons
_______________________________________________
paludis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
