The first was well done. I've got very little to complain about its story line.

The second, let me see, the second.... in a word SUCKED. 
(Yes, I'm shouting that word)

The third kept up with the continuity of #1, and I liked it.

The fourth killed off Connor. I'd recommend #4 as a stand alone and don't watch 
any of the others. Light years better than #2

The fifth, which was shown on The Sci-Fi Channel, I don't know too much about 
because I've haven't seen it yet. I've got a recording of it and plan on 
watching it, but I've got to find the time and a computer to watch it on. I 
have the latter, but the former is getting difficult. 

I'm hoping for the reverse of the Star Trek the Motion Picture effect.

Duane


--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Mandy F <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Mandy F <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Papermodels II 34777] Re: Just got something realllly cool in the 
> mail!
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:27 PM
> I saw the first highlander.. vaguely remember it, but lost
> interest after 
> that. :)  I also liked Star Gate until they took it to
> Atlantis. They took 
> out my reason for watching! Jack and the yummy blonde guy
> with the glasses. 
> XD
> 
> Mandy
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Duane Brimhall"
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 6:26 AM
> Subject: [Papermodels II 34770] Re: Just got something
> realllly cool in the 
> mail!
> 
> 
> >
> > You might want to add "Highlander" (the
> movies *AND* maybe the series) to 
> > the continuity conundrum. That was a definitely
> screwed up series (the 
> > movies at least). 
> 
> 
> 

      

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Papermodels II" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Papermodels?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to