>> Dear all, >> >> Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better manage our WG >> meeting time. >> >> As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to IDs that >> were already "presented" during previous >> IETF meetings, refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without >> discussion on the mailing list ... >> >> As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to discuss open issues that >> could not be resolved by email >> attempting to reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list. >> >> You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had during the >> Routing Area meeting at the last IETF. >> >> Few points here: >> 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is perfectly fine to get a >> "presentation" slot when first posted (rev -00) if >> time permits (priority will be given to slots allocated to resolve technical >> issues discussed on the mailing list). >> Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to have read each >> document, you may want to explain >> the issue that you are trying to solve, and how. >> 2) Before requesting a slot, please make sure that your intent is to discuss >> specific technical issues related to >> the document that could not be resolved on the mailing list. In other words, >> please do not request slots for IDs >> for which no discussion took place on the mailing list. >> >> With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no later than >> Monday July 18 at noon ET? >> Julien and I will publish the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some >> delays but hopefully an improved >> agenda. >> >> Many Thanks. >> >> JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
