Dear all,
Julien and I spent quite some time carefully reviewing the slot requests to see
which ones would
match the criteria below. The PCE WG agenda for IETF-81 will be published very
shortly.
We have allocated slots to:
- version -00 document
- WG documents that have been updated since the last IETF
We have not allocated slots to documents that have already been presented (some
of them have
been presented SEVERAL times) for which there was NO discussion on the mailing
list.
The objective is of course to make sure that we are all using the mailing to
make progress and spend
time during IETF meetings to resolve issues that were not resolved thanks to
discussion on the mailing
list.
Thanks for your understanding.
JP and Julien.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "JP Vasseur" <[email protected]>
> Date: July 13, 2011 5:07:10 PM GMT+02:00
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Daniel King" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Pce] Rules to request a "slot" during PCE WG Meetings
>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better manage our WG
>>> meeting time.
>>>
>>> As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to IDs that
>>> were already "presented" during previous
>>> IETF meetings, refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without
>>> discussion on the mailing list ...
>>>
>>> As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to discuss open issues that
>>> could not be resolved by email
>>> attempting to reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list.
>>>
>>> You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had during the
>>> Routing Area meeting at the last IETF.
>>>
>>> Few points here:
>>> 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is perfectly fine to get a
>>> "presentation" slot when first posted (rev -00) if
>>> time permits (priority will be given to slots allocated to resolve
>>> technical issues discussed on the mailing list).
>>> Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to have read each
>>> document, you may want to explain
>>> the issue that you are trying to solve, and how.
>>> 2) Before requesting a slot, please make sure that your intent is to
>>> discuss specific technical issues related to
>>> the document that could not be resolved on the mailing list. In other
>>> words, please do not request slots for IDs
>>> for which no discussion took place on the mailing list.
>>>
>>> With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no later than
>>> Monday July 18 at noon ET?
>>> Julien and I will publish the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some
>>> delays but hopefully an improved
>>> agenda.
>>>
>>> Many Thanks.
>>>
>>> JP and Julien.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
