Dear J-P & Julien
I had requested slots for following new drafts; intent is to introduce the work, focusing on the motivation behind it. Explicit-Path Per Destination in PCEP-P2MP [ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-p2mp-per-destination/ ] Explicit Path here refers to the configured list of network elements that MUST be traversed or MUST be excluded in the final path computation. Encoding of Data Structure (DS) in PCEP [ http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-ds/ ] Mechanism to use other DS (apart from VSPT) in PCEP, allowing it to be easily extendible Extended-VSPT, disjoint-VSPT are already defined in other WG documents. Request WG-members to read this and provide comments/suggestions. Regards, Dhruv **************************************************************************** *********** Dhruv Dhody, Senior Tecnical Leader, Huawei Tecnologies, Bangalore, India, Ph. +91-9845062422 This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:37 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Daniel King Subject: [Pce] Rules to request a "slot" during PCE WG Meetings Dear all, Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better manage our WG meeting time. As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to IDs that were already "presented" during previous IETF meetings, refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without discussion on the mailing list ... As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to discuss open issues that could not be resolved by email attempting to reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list. You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had during the Routing Area meeting at the last IETF. Few points here: 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is perfectly fine to get a "presentation" slot when first posted (rev -00) if time permits (priority will be given to slots allocated to resolve technical issues discussed on the mailing list). Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to have read each document, you may want to explain the issue that you are trying to solve, and how. 2) Before requesting a slot, please make sure that your intent is to discuss specific technical issues related to the document that could not be resolved on the mailing list. In other words, please do not request slots for IDs for which no discussion took place on the mailing list. With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no later than Monday July 18 at noon ET? Julien and I will publish the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some delays but hopefully an improved agenda. Many Thanks. JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
