Hi J-P and Julien, I have made a request for time slots for one presentation, I also would like to confirm this is indeed fit the criteria or not. - PCEP extensions for GMPLS (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions ) (5 minutes, presenter : Margaria) We request 5 minutes to present the improvement in processing rules to match what was presented in Prague, those are the result of private discussion we would like to share with the WG. The textual changes are minimal but have bigger implication for a PCC/PCE that want to implements the document. We would also like feedback on what is missing in the document in its current form to go in the direction of LC-ready document. Based on the current discussion on the list it seems rather difficult to fulfill the requirements. BR
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext JP Vasseur Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:07 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Daniel King Subject: [Pce] Rules to request a "slot" during PCE WG Meetings Dear all, Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better manage our WG meeting time. As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to IDs that were already "presented" during previous IETF meetings, refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without discussion on the mailing list ... As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to discuss open issues that could not be resolved by email attempting to reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list. You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had during the Routing Area meeting at the last IETF. Few points here: 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is perfectly fine to get a "presentation" slot when first posted (rev -00) if time permits (priority will be given to slots allocated to resolve technical issues discussed on the mailing list). Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to have read each document, you may want to explain the issue that you are trying to solve, and how. 2) Before requesting a slot, please make sure that your intent is to discuss specific technical issues related to the document that could not be resolved on the mailing list. In other words, please do not request slots for IDs for which no discussion took place on the mailing list. With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no later than Monday July 18 at noon ET? Julien and I will publish the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some delays but hopefully an improved agenda. Many Thanks. JP and Julien. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
