Any updates on this? I promise to take (one of) the official role(s) of "SVN newbie help" to all that need it after (if?) the change takes place : ).
Regarding the user accounts, Zope seems to have XML export for objects http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/2_6Edition/UsingZope.stx. That could perhaps be parsed for migrating to LDAP? (if this is completely off base, sorry : ), I only skimmed quickly through.) Finally, regarding the CVS ACLs, these should be easily translatable to Subversion Per-directory Access Control (which does mean we'd have to run Subversion via Apache). This is covered on pg. 132 of the SVN Book http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.httpd.html#svn.serverconfig.httpd.authz.perdir Luke On 8/21/06, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 13, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> Frank Barknecht wrote: >> >>> 1) developer vote: >>> >>> Should the SF repository switch from CVS to SVN on Sourceforge? >>> [ ] yes >>> [ ] no >> >> i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of >> acl for svn? or can we live without acl's? > > Uh, we need to check this. But AFAIK we currently only use the ACL on > Miller's branch. There are a few more ACLs than that: http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/CVSROOT/avail?view=markup This is probably important, so it needs to be sorted before the transition. If ACLs are in place, then I vote YES, otherwise MAYBE (there would have to be some more politicing)... .hc >>> 2) sort out techical issues with branches, tags etc. >> >> for externals i would suggest to split branches on each external >> separately, (e.g. /externals/zexy/trunk instead of /trunk/ >> externals/zexy >> or /externals/trunk/zexy) > > Yes, I agree with this, but this can be dealt with after The Big > Change, I suppose. For the externals we also should to take care not > to break the extended Build-system. Some changes will be necessary to > the Build of course, because of the usual trunk/tags/branches layout > in SVN. > > I cannot really comment on how to best deal with the branches of Pd's > sources. > >>> 3) find someone (incl. admins!) who volunteers to do the import. I >>> would volunteer but I wouldn't want to do this completely alone. >> >> i would volunteer too, however i don't see any advantage in having >> 2 (or >> more) persons involved in the migration. (probably when they are >> at the >> same terminal, like with XP, then there might be a benefit) > > Let's do it mid-September then, when I'm in Graz. ;) > > I would actually prefer if someone else than me would do it, as I'm > not that experienced especially with CVS internals, so I would gladly > let you take over. > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. - David Zicarelli _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
