Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart way to go. Especially interchangeability of GUI components. Who knows when a nice, new version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to be easily dropped into place...
~Kyle On 12/14/06, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language, I propose moving >> the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the "extra" folder, >> compiled as individual files. The only changes needed to make this >> happen is to rename and move the relevant g_*.c files to extra, >> renaming the setup() functions accordingly, and changing the >> makefile. All of these are pretty trivial. >> >> Thoughts, comments, objections, improvements? >> I'm all for it, in my opinion all gui elements should be optional and/ or exchangeable. greetings, Thomas _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-- http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
