Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five years, I
say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any
actual objections?
well, i would not do it.
i am a string advocate of splitting the pd-core from its objects (as far
as this is possible: i don't think of getting rid of [pd], [inlet],
[switch~] and friends).
but there is no real use in getting IEMGUI's separated when the
numberbox, the signal-objects and the math are still part of core pd.
however, if you feel the urge to do so and you feel like patching
pd-vanilla for each release, go on.
you could also do a fork ;-)
(it all boils down to: do you have any real benefits from this? or are
you just bored and need some work to do oer the holidays ;-) ?)
mfg.adr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
