On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart way to go.
Especially interchangeability of GUI components. Who knows when a nice, new
version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to be easily
dropped into place...
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker]. If
someone had wanted to change the IEMGUIs, they would've done it already.
This suggestion doesn't stem from need. I don't think that this "who
knows" is backed by likelihood. If a rogue programmer would please stand
up now, we might have a reason...
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five years, I say
no, we don't need this to happen.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
