On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart
way to go.
Especially interchangeability of GUI components. Who knows when a
nice, new
version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to
be easily
dropped into place...
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in
[objectmaker]. If someone had wanted to change the IEMGUIs, they
would've done it already. This suggestion doesn't stem from need. I
don't think that this "who knows" is backed by likelihood. If a
rogue programmer would please stand up now, we might have a reason...
What is [objectmaker]?
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five years,
I say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any
actual objections?
.hc
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC
Canada_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three
meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds,
and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin
Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
