Quoting Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen >> using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order? >> Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs? >> >> > > Maybe it was just me misusing [s~], if you create more than > one [s~] with the same argument then only the last one created > works. >
that is what "one-to-many" means: exactly one(1) [send~] and many(many) [receive~] objects. mfg.asd IOhannes ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list