On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:57:23 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Andy Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Thankyou Frank. Remember we talked about problems that happen > >> using more than one [r~]. Was that to do with creation order? > >> Or is that something that only affects [throw~][catch~] pairs? > >> > >> > > > > Maybe it was just me misusing [s~], if you create more than > > one [s~] with the same argument then only the last one created > > works.
Yes, I understand that Iohannes, the remark is about the behaviour you get if you don't understand and misuse [s~][r~]. It surprised me that it accepted the instance and replaced the old one. cheers, Andy > > > > that is what "one-to-many" means: exactly one(1) [send~] and > many(many) [receive~] objects. > > mfg.asd > IOhannes > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list -- Use the source _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
