On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At this point probably not many. My comment had to do with the television ads > that tout "and you don't even need a computer to view your images" cameras. Really? I've never seen those ads, but then I've lived without TV for about 5 months now. <g> > How do they work? Not very well, I'd imagine. There are printers that can print directly from memory cards, but a computer is pretty much an essential tool for digital cameras. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Juan J. Buhler
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Bruce Dayton
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Mark Roberts
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility William Robb
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility William Robb
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility William Robb
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Chris Brogden
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Otis Wright, Jr.
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Juan J. Buhler
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Mark Roberts
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Juan J. Buhler
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Dan Scott
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds

