Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160)

[William Robb]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Cermak"
Subject: Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160)


> Mafud,
>
> Would you say that Kodak Film/Paper/Chemicals is a better
combination than
> Fuji Film/Paper/Chemicals?
>
Gerald Cermak asks:
> What do the lab operators on the list think?
>
I think the operator is more important than the product used. I
can get absolute colour matching from 3 different manufacturers
of paper where I live. Kodak, Fuji, and Konica papers for sure
can be made to look the same. Fuji paper is more colour stable
than Kodak, as is Konica. I don't know about Agfa or the other
manufacturers of paper, either for colour stability or colour
response.
I like Kodak's N surface, though others I know dislike it.

There are far too many factors at play to make blanket
statements about one product line or another. Members of the
PDML should know this better than most.
William Robb



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .