Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >I don't think it's the film or the scanner. I think it's the combination of 4,000 dpi resolution and the grain/clump/cloud characteristics of different films. I appears that 4,000 dpi is in the "really not sweet spot" for the types of film I've been using (primarily Kodak negative films ... Royal Gold 100 & 400 act about as bad as anything I've scanned so far).
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ< i rarely use Royal Gold 100, but i have 3 frames that i scanned from some i took this summer and i can't see anything like what you show. i also rarely shoot any ISO 400 film, but the closest i saw to what you show is from my roll of Elite Chrome 400. even then, it wasn't as noticeable. i assume no sharpening was applied? Herb...
