I have the Vivitar 24/2.8 and used to own the 19/3.8. The 24 is vastly superior in terms of flare control. The 19 basically has no flare control, even flaring outside in cloudy bright condition. The 24 also has better sharpness in the corners, and better contrast and slightly bolder colors.

I have found the Nikon HN-3 hood will work with the Vivitar 24 with no apparent vignetting. (also works well with the K30/2.8 and FA28-70/4 too)

I had the 19/3.8 for about 6 years, ended up giving it to a friend who promptly lost it hiking. He misses it, I don't. If you really want wide, cheap, get the Zenitar 16/2.8. That's a killer lens.

If you have any other questions, don't hesitate to ask.

William in Utah.






From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Speaking of M series lenses
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:14:38 -0500

Good idea, anyone have an opinion on the Vivitar 24 2.8 or the 19 3.8?

Evan


From: "Peter Alling"

> You might want to forgo the Pentax Glass if you can't afford it right
> now. There are quite a few third party
> lenses which would suffice if you're careful how you use them in flare
> producing situations. That is unless you have a deal you don't think will
> ever come around again, and this doesn't sound like one.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Reply via email to