On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] P�l Jensen wrote: > The niche might be nice for film, as most anti-digital are going to be > rather conservative. However, for a company that plans to a major
And if the anti-digital people could have a camera that's laid out like their classic favourite, but with a digital sensor? > player in digital, like Pentax, fundamentally retro is probably not > even in the cards. I'm confident that the coming DSLR is modern and > contemporary in every way. Which, to me, sounds like they can call it the P60 and I can safely say that I have no interest in buying one, because while I have _some_ investment in Pentax glass, if I'm going to buy a digital SLR just like all the others, I'll buy it from the very well established market leader, Canon. So, as I've said..I've never seen the MZ-S, but to me it sounds like the MZ-S and the MZ-D would've been a killer set when matched to each other, and when held to the classic Pentax line. Of the MZ-S, just how is its viewfinder? Small and dark like the other ZX cameras I've seen? (truthfully, I'm 100% biased here, I'm comparing apples to oranges, or the 645's viewfinder to the ZX-50/5/5n/L, probably not very fair) -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
