The M100/2.8 is nice. Focuses to 1 meter the same as the 85/2.0 but being slightly longer give a nice headshot at that distance. In the old days I had the 85 and the 135 and could not justify a 100 in addition. The thing about a 100mm on 135 film is it gives about the same view as I see when I am concentrating on something, so it matches my vision well. I still have to throw it against a brick wall (test it by shooting a brick wall straight on and diagonally which will show sharpness, distortion, and focus accuracy), but casual shots so far look good.
Ciao, Graywolf ---------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 7:39 AM Subject: Re: OT - Blowing my own horn > GreyWolf, how do you like the M100/2.8 so far? > > T Rittenhouse wrote: > > > > Thanks to Stan on the list I now have the M100/2.8 a lens I have always > > wanted. > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/03
