----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: What do you think?



>
> While I don't doubt you wrt to Grain Surgery's abilities, I tend to.  And
you're
> right, why should anyone want to make a digital image look like a real
> photograph.  My point is that enough people do, otherwise Grain Surgery
wouldn't
> exist.  It strikes me that perhaps a lot of digi users are suffering an
> inferiority complex, and feel that digital should produce results like
film.

Photography suffered the same sorts of growing pains when in it's infancy as
well. Thus, the early photographers who manipulated their negatives so as to
get pictures that looked like paintings.
Photography also had a hell of a time promoting itself as an artisitc
medium, and in some circles, this is still an unresolved debate.
However, through all this, photography gained acceptance, and has almost
completely replaced oil painting as a means of artisitc representation.

Digital imaging, be it direct to digital, or via scanned film is at the same
point as film photography was a hundred or so years ago. Still an infant
technology, and generally being practiced by people who are in a
transitional state themselves, who are trying to find their own way to where
they want to be.
At some point, digital will, like silver before it, grow up and become an
accepted medium on its own merits.
Until then, like it's forbearer, people will attempt to make it emulate what
it is, in essence, replacing.

And don't kid yourself, digital imaging will supplant silver imaging. The
signs are already out there, you would have to be deliberately blind to not
see what is coming.

Some digital users may be trying to make the medium emulate film, but at
some point they will see that there is no reason to, will realize that the
medium is different, in some ways better than film, in other ways not, and
will learn how to take advantage of the improvements offered, while
minimizing the compromised demanded.
It's something photographers have been doing since the invention of
photography.

William Robb

Reply via email to