John, was the strange word a *g*-word? Yeak. I love my PZ-1 too. It's my only autofocus body. I allready have focal lengths form 20 to 30 mmm - (with the *ist D Ioll need more wideanlges, though) What I really want is faster atofocus and probably more than one fokuspoint.
Jens -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 11. februar 2004 18:19 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: MZ-S vs. *ist D > > Thank you very much Rob, John and Steve > I still can't make up my mind, choosing between the two. I'd really like to > have both. Then I wouldn't need other bodies, except maby for backup. Need? _Need_!? What is this strange word? Seriously, though - the *ist-D and the MZ-S do cover most bases (although you're possibly going to be out of luck with lenses in the future; should Pentax release something nice in the FA-J line you'd have problems on the MZ-S). I still keep the PZ-1p around, too - although the autofocus isn't anywhere near as good as that on the MZ-S the faster film advance is nice to have on occasion, and since I don't have the newer flash the PZ-1p can do everything the MZ-S does with the FTZ-500 and a bit more.
