What's wrong, did you hope for a 12mm, or a 12-24mm? I think they're starting with the most mainsteam lenses. Many consider anything below 20mm (for FF) as specialist area, and not for the mass market.
I doubt if we will ever see DA lenses much above 20mm. Even Nikon 12-24 is said to be FF from 18mm and up. DagT > > Fra: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > As usual, the Pentax Way is questionable in recent history. What were they > thinking when they decided to make 18-35. 16-45 & now 14? I think they have > to do a lot better on their "plans". More randomly released products will > only confuse consumers and turn off their loyal fans. > > Regards, > Alan Chan > http://www.pbase.com/wlachan > > >Of course for *istD owners who are using FA24-90, FA28-70, Sigma 24-60/2.8, > >etc the 14mm would be great. But having just purchased a DA16-45 14mm is > >not enough of a difference for me to justify the expense. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca > >
