Alan Chan wrote: > > What were they > thinking when they decided to make 18-35. 16-45 & now 14? I think they have > to do a lot better on their "plans". More randomly released products will > only confuse consumers and turn off their loyal fans.
DA 16-45 is okay, since the FAJ 18-35 is so so on *ist D. The FAJ 18-35 is a cheap budget lens making little sense with the *ist D (rather poor image quality) and not so much more sense with the *ist (rather interesting, but sure not a high priority lens). DA 14/2.8 is okay, since the A 15/3.5 is dull on the *ist D (still crying after having to admit that). However, what about a decent performer over 45mm? Why the hell Pentax has not still introduced a DA 50-150 f/4 or the like? Do they assume we have to buy Sigma/Tamron? I find this amazing! Dario Bonazza
