On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Alan Chan wrote: > As usual, the Pentax Way is questionable in recent history. What were they > thinking when they decided to make 18-35. 16-45 & now 14?
What are you talking about? The 16-45 is DA, not fully functional on film cameras. 18-35 is the option there (except if you have an old-interface camera, 'cause it has no aperture ring). And the 14mm is a f2.8 DA prime. Are you saying they should not have marketed the FA24/2.0 or even the FA50/1.4 because of the FA28-80/4.5-5.6? Digital and film are different formats. Kostas
