On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Alan Chan wrote: > Why bother the 18-35 when they were going to release the 16-45?
Because one costs $160 weighing a feather light 190g with full frame coverage, and the other costs $430 with a more substantial 365g weight for digital bodies only. > Why a prime 14 when they already have a 16-45? Why not 14-?? in the > first place? Cos primes has less compromise than zoom and it is faster at F2.8. A F2.8 zoom in this range would be quite a monster. -- --Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~lawrence/ -Key ID:0x6D23F3C4--
