On 12/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: >I get prints that suit me just fine up to 8x10 with even the Optio S. I >guess I need to try something larger than 8x12 with the *ist D. I really >don't give a rat's a** about the "megapixel equivalent of 35mm" as long as >I'm happy with what I hang on the wall. It also seems that most clients of >wedding photogs feel the same way I do. IMO it's trying to compare apples >and oranges.
I completely agree. I'll be bringing a few 16"X11" prints with me (from 6MP) to GFM if anyonme would like to have a look. Another thing to consider is the quality of the printer hardware and the ability of the person processing the image WRT how 6MP translates to a finished picture. A mediocre printer will only ever produce mediocre prints, at best, even with a good operator. An excellent printer is quite capable of producing the same mediocre print - but excels when a good operator can produce a superb print... Like Bill initmates, the proof is in the pudding ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
