Opps,misunderstood,but your right,it is amazing.
Maybe John can get my capture 4 and P-400 to like one another.LOL

Dave          

                                > I think you misunderstood.  We havent seen a 
comparison of John's
> conversion yet.  This is Pentax PhotoLab vs Photoshop CS.  Mind you,
> bloody amazing that he has written a convertor!!
> 
> I would be really interested to see his results with this image!
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: 11 March 2004 11:30
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: RAW Conversion comparison
> > 
> > 
> > I'm constantly amazed at the talent on this list.
> > Making a version for sale John.??
> > 
> > Dave      
> > 
> >                                     > Interesting. I do see the 
> > edge difference.  I also 
> > see a general 
> > > difference in the color balance.  The pentax version looks more
> > > saturated to me, maybe a little warmer also.
> > > 
> > > rg
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Rob Brigham wrote:
> > > 
> > > >I have been reading many people sceptical about the differences in 
> > > >the quality produced by the Pentax RAW convertor and the 
> > other tools 
> > > >around.
> > > >
> > > >I have done a comparison between PhotoLab & Photoshop CS 
> > which, to my 
> > > >eye at least, shows a stark view of the differences.
> > > >
> > > >http://www.calcot.plus.com/Pentax/LabVShop.jpg
> > > >http://www.calcot.plus.com/Pentax/LabVShop2.jpg
> > > >
> > > >Look at the edge between the sleeve & background.  The Pentax 
> > > >conversion if pretty horrible here, with a big black line 
> > around the 
> > > >edge.  CS also has slightly better sharpness and detail.
> > > >
> > > >IF you want a tiff of the zoom view then here ya go...
> > > >
> > > >http://www.calcot.plus.com/Pentax/LabVShop2.tif
> > > >
> > > >Would be interested in comparison of other tools - if 
> > anyone can do 
> > > >one for me (john?) I can send them the PEF to work on.
> > > >
> > > >Cheers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> >                             
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

                                


Reply via email to