In the larger image, the Pentax conversion is the one on the left? This
image, to my eye (and on my monitor), has a cleaner white in the jacket,
much better skin tone (the PS skin tone is sickly yellowish), more
saturated blue, and more saturated red lips. It may be just a little
softer, but I could correct that. The Pentax conversion has overall a
warmer and more pleasing tone.
On the jacket, both images show a fringe, with the image converted by
Pentax showing just a bit more pronounced fringe.
Overall I prefer the Pentax conversion.
When I first looked at this I thought "Oh, ****, I will have to get
Windows XP and PS CS." Looking at the images more closely, perhaps I
don't need to after all.
Joe
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Brigham
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Frits W�thrich
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Jan van Wijk
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Studdert
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison Herb Chong
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Brigham
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison brooksdj
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Brigham
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison brooksdj
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Brigham
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison Joseph Tainter
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Studdert
- RE: RAW Conversion comparison Rob Brigham
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison John Francis
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison Jostein
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison Gonz
- Re: RAW Conversion comparison John Francis

