By all means, please do (or at least back up your assertion with some
form of evidence...)
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 00:43, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 19 Jul 2004 at 22:44, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
"I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be significantly
greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows
that.
What I didn't expect, is how large the difference is."
Full article at:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/
Note carefully the formats of the cameras to which the article refers.
The
difference between DOF when switching between 35mm ff and *ist D is
negligible.
I can publish a short web based paper about it if that will make my
view more
valid for you.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
