I can upload an example that I think provides a better example of *istD
sharpness than your eye. Shot with the *istD and the DA 16-45 last
weekend.
Full Image:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2829588&size=lg
Detail:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2829590&size=lg
Paul
On Oct 28, 2004, at 6:33 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Any sample to show?
And I mean a lifesize sample, not a picture downsized for the
internet. A
detail is enough, I don't need the whole picture. Thanks.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: F24-50
On 28 Oct 2004 at 20:16, Dario Bonazza wrote:
On the contrary, I was desperately looking for someone capable to
proof
I
was wrong, but I mostly got irritated comments, hence I believe I was
disturbing those who don't like the doubt they are less than clever.
And
those few show up again and again...
If you are citing the over-sharpened eye section that you presented
the
other
day as proof of the *ist D capabilities then I'm far from surprised
that
no one
had anything definite or positive to say. Gauging your example
against the
results that I can produce now I would not have been happy with your
result and
I don't think it was of any value trying to guess what camera lens
combination
lead to the creation of the image.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
