On 29 Oct 2004 at 1:27, Dario Bonazza wrote: > Not bad, not bad at all. I cannot say it's better or worse than my crop > (different subject, different anything...), but in any case it's nor far > away. On 29 Oct 2004 at 1:27, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Not bad, not bad at all. I cannot say it's better or worse than my crop > (different subject, different anything...), but in any case it's nor far > away. The subject in the example images weren't really of consequence, I was looking at and judging then from a purely technical aesthetic perceptive. I was was thinking along the lines of Willy when I saw it, between the unsharpened and sharpened versions would have been where I would have thought it would have been best viewed, the sharpened one seemed too edgy, more like a P&S digicam output. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
