Re: F24-50

[Paul Stenquist]

When someone challenges your assertions, it doesn't mean they're hurt 
or even annoyed with you. It's just a discussion. We enjoy the 
discourse. It's not a problem.  Lighten up.
Paul
On Oct 28, 2004, at 6:56 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:

I knew that I had to stop before raising all this nonsense again.
Now I don't only have to ask myself either "Will this hurt WRobb?" or 
"Will
this hurt Shel?" every time I'm posting to the list (for opposite 
reasons,
BTW, since Wrobb is disturbed when I'm not enough happy with the 
*istD, and
Shel is usully disturbed when I'm too happy with the *istD, vs. film). 
Now
it looks like I'll also have to think "Will this hurt Rob?"

I believe that when I'll be able to stop all this, I'll unsubscribe, 
so that
I'll no longer hurt too sensible folks (and it will be the first time 
since
1997, excluding short vacations).

Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: F24-50

On 28 Oct 2004 at 20:16, Dario Bonazza wrote:
On the contrary, I was desperately looking for someone capable to 
proof
I
was wrong, but I mostly got irritated comments, hence I believe I was
disturbing those who don't like the doubt they are less than clever. 
And
those few show up again and again...
If you are citing the over-sharpened eye section that you presented 
the
other
day as proof of the *ist D capabilities then I'm far from surprised 
that
no one
had anything definite or positive to say. Gauging your example 
against the
results that I can produce now I would not have been happy with your
result and
I don't think it was of any value trying to guess what camera lens
combination
lead to the creation of the image.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998