On 29 Oct 2004 at 9:46, Steve Jolly wrote: > I would just mention > that JPEG compression also introduces artefacts that look very similar > to the ones you mention here - did you check the web versions to make > sure that nothing extra was introduced?
Hi Steve, A very fair question, I did try to ensure that the JPG conversion didn't swamp the problem with it's own artifacts, unfortunately it's just as apparent in the original conversion. I'm not sure if it's a case of spill or some other sensor problem given the intensity of the original colour or if it's a function of the post processing. In any case to better illustrate the effect I've made a small 1:1 crop of the original 4096x2734 PX 16bit ProPhoto RGB file saved as LZW TIFF: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP6024.tif (1.65MB) Any ideas? Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
